Resolution of financial debts cannot be left solely in the hands of individual banks and their policies: petitioner
Business and industry sectors, seeking an extension of moratorium or even waiver of interest on loans, told the Supreme Court on Thursday that the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) must collect empirical data on the financial stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Appearing before a Bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan, senior advocate Ravindra Shrivastava, representing one of the petitioners, said there was need for a calibrated policy to be implemented under the Disaster Management Act.
Resolution of financial debts cannot be left solely in the hands of individual banks and their policies, he submitted in his rejoinder to the court.
Absolute distress was prevailing at the moment… Huge profits being made by banks. This was a case where the NDMA should have come out, instead of handing over to banks, he submitted.
The court reserved the case for judgment.
On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintained in the court that there had not been a single case of COVID-19 related financial stress to which banks have shown an “apathetic” attitude.
The court is hearing several pleas by industry and business sectors, including power and real estate, to extend the moratorium or even waive the interest on their debts due to losses incurred during the pandemic.
The Indian Banks Association had said these pleas extend beyond the financial stress caused by the pandemic. He asked whether some of these sectors have placed on record anything to reveal how wobbly they were even before the pandemic.
In his turn, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for the State Bank of India, had pleaded in support of the small depositors who form the “backbone” of the banking system.
“Small depositors are faceless in these proceedings. It is not a case of borrowers versus bank. They are the backbone of the financial system. Banks have to give interest to these depositors. How can we leave them?”, Mr. Rohatgi had asked.
The RBI had told the court that extending the date of the loan moratorium was “not viable”.
It had referred to clause 3 of its August 6 circular for ‘Resolution Framework for COVID-19-related Stress’ to point out that lending institutions, guided by their respective Board-approved policy, would prepare viable resolution plans for eligible borrowers. However, the benefits would only be provided for borrowers stressed on account of COVID-19.